一 | (ECNS) -- U.S. restrictions on Chinese companies over alleged “forced labor” are facing growing scrutiny, both over the facts behind such accusations and the legal procedures used to enforce them. Recently, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), under the Department of Homeland Security, updated its records to remove Hoshine Silicon (Jia Xing) Co., Ltd., a Chinese photovoltaic supply-chain company, from the scope of a Withhold Release Order (WRO) related to alleged forced labor in Xinjiang. Li Guogang, senior legal counsel at Tahota Law Firm who represented Hoshine Silicon, told China News Network that this is the first known case of a Chinese company being removed from the scope of such a U.S. enforcement measure related to Xinjiang. He described it as a milestone for Chinese companies seeking to challenge U.S. actions involving alleged forced labor. From being targeted to having to prove its innocence In recent years, the U.S. has repeatedly used WROs and Xinjiang-related legislation to impose trade restrictions on Chinese companies. For businesses caught up in such enforcement measures, proving that their products and supply chains are not connected to alleged forced labor can become a major hurdle. The Hoshine case highlights the difficult burden placed on companies facing such measures. Rather than authorities being required to disclose the full basis for their allegations through a transparent process, affected companies may find themselves having to submit extensive evidence to demonstrate that the accusations against them are unfounded. “We submitted 4,000 to 5,000 pages of materials, including audit results and detailed explanations of the supply chain, to demonstrate that the allegations of forced labor against Hoshine Silicon were without factual basis,” Li said. The company’s experience also shows how difficult it can be for businesses to challenge such enforcement actions. According to Li, U.S. customs authorities initially rejected Hoshine Silicon’s applications for removal twice. The situation changed after the company took the case to the U.S. Court of International Trade. The dispute subsequently moved through judicial proceedings, and the enforcement measure was eventually lifted as it applied to Hoshine Silicon. The shift from administrative enforcement to judicial review is significant. It shows that when allegations lack sufficient factual support, legal procedures can still provide companies with an important avenue to seek relief and challenge government decisions. The significance goes beyond one company The significance of the Hoshine case lies in more than one company being removed from the scope of a U.S. trade restriction. In recent years, U.S. restrictions on Chinese companies have expanded far beyond traditional tariffs, extending into supply chains, investment, technology and national security. Issues involving Xinjiang and alleged military ties have also increasingly become part of Washington’s economic policy toolkit toward China. One direct result is greater uncertainty for Chinese companies seeking to enter or operate in the U.S. market. Businesses must consider not only product prices, quality and competitiveness, but also the additional risks created by shifts in U.S. domestic politics and regulatory policy. China’s Ministry of Commerce has repeatedly stated that Xinjiang enjoys social stability, economic development and improving living standards, and that there is no forced labor of any kind in the region. A recent case involving Chinese pharmaceutical and life-sciences company WuXi AppTec offers another example worth watching. The company has also challenged its designation by the U.S. Department of Defense as a “Chinese military company.” A U.S. court recently granted WuXi AppTec a preliminary injunction, temporarily blocking the designation while the case proceeds. The court found that the company was likely to succeed in arguing that the Defense Department’s decision was arbitrary and capricious, pointing to problems in how some of the evidence had been interpreted. From Xinjiang-related restrictions to military-related designations, the U.S. government has increasingly brought political and national-security considerations into its treatment of Chinese companies. When political tools are repeatedly used to blacklist Chinese businesses, the consequences go beyond the outcome of a single lawsuit. They can also affect global companies’ confidence in the predictability of the U.S. market and its legal and regulatory environment. If companies must spend enormous amounts of time and money simply to demonstrate that allegations against them lack sufficient evidence, questions inevitably arise over whether confidence in U.S. market rules and legal institutions can be sustained. Commercial rules ultimately depend on institutions that are stable, transparent and predictable. When administrative power increasingly intervenes in normal international trade, and when market risks depend more heavily on political judgments, the impact extends beyond one company or one supply chain. It can shape global businesses’ long-term expectations of the stability and reliability of the U.S. market. The cases of Hoshine Silicon and WuXi AppTec have therefore opened more than a gap in individual blacklists. They have exposed a potential crack in the broader machinery of U.S. sanctions and restrictions. When allegations fail to withstand legal scrutiny and enforcement actions lack sufficient factual support, the credibility of those measures inevitably comes into question. For Chinese companies, the message from these cases is clear: being placed under a U.S. restriction does not necessarily mark the end of the story. Evidence, legal procedures and judicial review can still challenge administrative decisions — and, in doing so, expose weaknesses in U.S. enforcement actions driven more by political considerations than by solid evidence. (By Gong Weiwei) 
。 ■ 本报记者 王雪娇
近日，全市经历了多轮强降雨过程，龙港区全面落实市委市政府部署，始终坚持把防汛工作放在重要位置，坚持人民至上、生命至上，全力做好“防大汛、抗大洪、抢大险、救大灾”的准备，努力确保人民群众生命财产安全。进入主汛期以来，龙港区成功防御了3次强降雨过程，没有出现洪涝灾情，防汛形势整体平稳。
二 | 根据雨情 统筹调度 据统计，从8月18日23:00时至8月21日8:00时，龙港区平均降雨量52.8mm，最大降雨量出现在龙湾街道，101.6mm。
三 | 城市个别路段出现轻微积水。龙港区正在组织市政队伍加强对城区排水系统的维护和疏通，目前水位正在消退。流经龙港区的6条河流径流有所增加，水势平稳。 区防指部门统筹调度，精准研判，主动向上沟通，强化部门会商，依靠技术手段，分析雨情趋势，实行每3小时一研判，进行专业决策、集体决策。区委区政府主要领导主持召开全区防御强降雨工作部署会议，先后5次召开会商调度会议，进行全面细致安排部署，始终确保全区防御工作紧张有序推进。 重点盯守 提前转移 龙港紧盯全区4处重点地质灾害易发区、1座尾矿库以及6处山洪易发生区，24座漫水桥，城区20个低洼易涝区域，辖区3家邻水危险化学品生产企业，海上172艘作业船只，全区3处海边、河边、山边景区景点。针对上述防汛重点，龙港区均已建立台账管理，并建立了《特殊人群排查台账》《危房险房排查台账》，责任落实到人。 依据雨情变化，龙港区提前研判危险点位，划定转移区域，目前已精准确定转移人口170人。并按照就近安全转移原则，已提前规划适合转移的安全路径和安置场所，同时做好食宿等相关保障工作。
四 | 备齐队伍 抓好储备 切实将“时时放心不下的责任感”转化为“事事心中有底的行动力”，从严从细从实夯实“防”的基础。为应对严峻的防汛形势，龙港区提前备齐队伍。成立2支专业抢险队伍、80余人随时待命，一旦发生险情，将第一时间赶赴抢险现场。 龙港区已建立完善的防汛物资储备体系，各项物资储备全部到位。共储备编织袋8万条，铁线40捆，锹200把，救生衣300件，抽水泵30台，大锤100把，镐200把，救生圈100个，制定了科学合理的物资调运方案，一旦出现险情，第一时间分配到位。已有部分物资提前下发至乡、街道。
五 | 同时，区防汛指挥部门密切关注气象动态，加强雨情、水情监测，及时发布预警信息。启动气象大喇叭15个，发送短信360余条，提示广大群众防风避险。
Current article:http://eyivloa.tichannangenzhuchuapin.cfd/gi13guz/20260826/70961.html
Published on:16:39:48